After applying DeepPRIME I do most of my processing in Adobe ACR and Photoshop.Īgree, main difference being I rely on C1 instead of ACR. I am mostly interested in the DeepPRIME noise reduction technology which is my primary reason for using Photolab. But in both pictures, I would say there is an improvement over non-XD DeepPrime. It may be that the effect is more pronounced with some pictures rather than others. The example of the Sistine Chapel ceiling from the first link seems a bit more impressive to me. On the XD example at the second DXO link you posted-of the woman's face in profile-the differences appear quite subtle on my screen, even n the magnify view. I would be very interested to hear your impressions-both on XD and the changes in 6 on the whole-after you have used it for a while. After applying DeepPRIME I do most of my processing in Adobe ACR and Photoshop.īlack Friday should see a big discount offer from DxO. On the 2 images I tried, I see no difference between DeepPRIME and DeepPRIME XD (but like I said, I have had only a few minutes of play). How often does DXO make discount offers on upgrades? I don't really remember any. Do you see much else that is a significant change in the program? The main benefit seems to DeepPrimeXD, which does look interesting. I don't recall their upgrades on Elite being that expensive before. The upgrade price from 5 to 6 for Elite versions is $139-pretty steep. The new release features DxO DeepPRIME XD, a more advanced version of the already spectacular DeepPRIME noise reduction technology. Here is a comparison to see if the upgrade is worth it for you.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |